Which method would MOST likely support the integrity of a voting machine?

Which method would MOST likely support the integrity of a voting machine?

• A. Asymmetric encryption
• B. Blockchain
• C. Transport Layer Security
• D. Perfect forward secrecy

Answer: (B)

Blockchain is the method that would most likely support the integrity of a voting machine. This technology is designed to provide a secure and tamper-proof ledger. In the context of voting systems, employing blockchain can ensure that each vote is recorded and stored in a way that is transparent and immutable. Once data is added to a blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted without consensus from the network, which helps in preventing fraud or manipulation. The decentralized nature of blockchain also means that there is no single point of failure, which adds an additional layer of security, making it difficult for malicious actors to influence the outcome of the voting process. The transparency offered by blockchain allows for audits and verification, where stakeholders can independently verify the votes without compromising the privacy of the voters. Other methods such as asymmetric encryption, Transport Layer Security (TLS), and perfect forward secrecy are important for protecting data in transit or ensuring secure communications. However, they do not inherently provide the same level of integrity, replication, and transparency that blockchain offers.

Blockchain is the method that would most likely support the integrity of a voting machine. This technology is designed to provide a secure and tamper-proof ledger. In the context of voting systems, employing blockchain can ensure that each vote is recorded and stored in a way that is transparent and immutable. Once data is added to a blockchain, it cannot be altered or deleted without consensus from the network, which helps in preventing fraud or manipulation.

The decentralized nature of blockchain also means that there is no single point of failure, which adds an additional layer of security, making it difficult for malicious actors to influence the outcome of the voting process. The transparency offered by blockchain allows for audits and verification, where stakeholders can independently verify the votes without compromising the privacy of the voters.

Other methods such as asymmetric encryption, Transport Layer Security (TLS), and perfect forward secrecy are important for protecting data in transit or ensuring secure communications. However, they do not inherently provide the same level of integrity, replication, and transparency that blockchain offers.